Instant paper summaries
Methods, findings, and limitations distilled into a scannable brief — with page-level references you can verify.
New · GPT-powered paper summaries
AI for research reading and notes
RA reads alongside you — turning dense papers into clear summaries, connected notes, and citations you can trust in seconds.
- Read papers up to 4× faster
- Summarize key points automatically
- Linked citations to the exact source
- Organize your notes into a knowledge graph
Summary ready · 42 sec
3 citations linked
Trusted by researchers at
Helix Lab
Northfield U.
Cedar Institute
BioStat Co.
Everything you need to stay on top of the literature
From first PDF to finished literature review — RA keeps every claim sourced, every note connected, and every paper summarized.
Connected notes & citations
Every highlight becomes a note linked back to its source paragraph, and forward to related papers in your library.
Research Q&A
Ask a question across your whole library and get a grounded answer with numbered citations — never a hallucinated one.
See it on your own paper
No sign-up required — drop a PDF and ask your first question in under a minute.
Interactive demo
Try RA on a sample paper — nothing is saved, no account needed.
1
Upload a paper
Drop a PDF here
or click to upload · we'll use a sample ML paper for the demo
2
Ask a research question
Answers cite the paper — click [n] to jump to the note.
Answer
Upload a paper and ask a question to see RA's cited answer.
Main findings
The study reports that sparse attention reduces inference cost by 38% while matching dense baselines on three of four benchmarks [1]. Gains are largest on long documents (4k+ tokens), where retrieval quality improves by 12 points [2].
However, the method underperforms on multi-hop reasoning tasks, a limitation the authors attribute to local-window truncation [3].
Confidence: high · grounded in 3 passages from the uploaded paper.
Efficiency result — §4.2
Sparse attention cuts FLOPs 38% vs. dense baseline with no measurable drop in summarization quality scores.
[1]
Long-document gains — §5.1
On the LongRangeQA set, retrieval precision improves 12 points over dense attention for inputs exceeding 4,000 tokens.
[2]
Limitation — §6 Discussion
Multi-hop reasoning degrades 6 points; authors link this to truncated local windows missing cross-document hops.
[3]
[1] Chen et al., 2024 — p. 7
"Sparse attention reduces FLOPs by 38% at inference while retaining baseline quality on three of four benchmarks."
[1] Chen et al., 2024 — Fig. 4, p. 9
Latency curves: sparse variant sustains ~1.6× throughput at 8k-token context length.
[2] Okafor & Lim, 2023 — p. 12
Reported retrieval precision gains for windowed attention on long-context QA suites.
[3] Vasireddy, 2024 — p. 15
Discussion of multi-hop failure modes and proposed remedy via hierarchical windows.
Choose the right plan
Start free in the demo, upgrade when your library grows. Cancel anytime.
Individual
For students & independent researchers
$9/ month
- 100 papers per month
- Unlimited summaries & Q&A
- Linked notes & citation export
- Zotero import
Team
For labs & research groups
$24/ user / month
- Everything in Individual
- Shared team library
- Collaborative annotations
- Admin & usage controls
Institutional
For universities & departments
Custompricing
- Unlimited seats & storage
- SSO & SAML provisioning
- Dedicated support & onboarding
- On-prem deployment option
All prices in USD, excluding tax. Individual & Team plans include a 14-day free trial.
Contact our team
For Team or Institutional pricing — tell us a bit about your group.
Inquiry sent!
Thanks — our sales team will get back to you within 1 business day. Taking you back to the overview…